Advanced Search

The story appears on

Page A2

December 13, 2017

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » World

Banker appeals double murder conviction

Source: AFP | 00:00 UTC+8 December 13, 2017 | Print Edition

A BRITISH banker jailed for life for the horrifying murder of two Indonesian women at his upscale Hong Kong apartment in a cocaine-fueled rampage appealed against his conviction yesterday.

Cambridge University graduate Rurik Jutting tortured Sumarti Ningsih for three days — filming parts of her ordeal on his phone — before slashing her throat with a serrated knife and stuffing her body into a suitcase.

Days later, and with Ningsih’s corpse on his balcony, the former Bank of America worker picked up Seneng Mujiasih, intending to play out the same fantasies.

He killed her when she started screaming.

Jutting, now 32, had pleaded guilty to manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility but was found guilty of murder with the judge at the time describing the killings as “sickening in the extreme.”

However, Jutting’s defense team yesterday argued that judge Michael Stuart-Moore had repeatedly given wrong directions to the jury during the trial last year when explaining how they should determine whether his state of mind had impaired his responsibility for his actions.

Defense lawyer Gerard McCoy argued the judge had wrongly told the jury to look for mental “disorders” rather than the broader spectrum of “abnormality of the mind.”

“Abnormality of mind need not be a disorder,” McCoy told the court yesterday. “The judge has wrongly and prescriptively directed the jury that they should look for disorders because disorders are what is an abnormality of mind.”

The defense team during the trial argued that Jutting’s mental responsibility had been substantially affected by heavy alcohol and cocaine use as well as sexual sadism and narcissistic personality disorders.

Not all four medical experts who testified agreed that Jutting’s behavior met the criteria for a “disorder” in all four areas, said McCoy.

However, they did all find that Jutting was suffering from an abnormality of mind because he had impaired mental functioning, he added.

“The ground of appeal is the judge wrongly directed the jury as to the true meaning of abnormality of the mind,” McCoy argued.

“All four experts agreed there were four concurrent abnormalities of the mind. That’s what the jury should have been asked: did those four functionings constitute an abnormality of the mind?” he asked.

Jutting was alert and taking notes in court yesterday, dressed in a blue shirt and wearing dark-rimmed glasses, at one point smiling and talking with the guards in the dock.

In the grueling 10-day trial in October and November last year, the jury heard how Jutting became obsessed with slavery, rape and torture — fantasies he acted out on his first victim, Ningsih.

The jury watched footage on phone of the attack as well as Jutting’s own self-recorded descriptions of how he had used pliers, sex toys and a belt during the killing. The hearing will continue today for prosecution arguments.

World


 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend