Advanced Search

The story appears on

Page A7

May 12, 2016

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » Opinion » Foreign Views

Japanese deficit surges as Abe’s ‘arrows’ miss mark

By Martin Feldstein | May 12, 2016, Thursday | Print Edition

The Japanese economy is a paradoxical mixture of prosperity and failure. And, in a significant way, its prosperity makes its failures difficult to address.

Japan’s affluence is palpable to anyone who visits Tokyo. The standard of living is high, with per capita income in 2015 (in terms of purchasing power parity) amounting to US$38,000, close to the US$41,000 average in France and Britain. The unemployment rate, at 3.3 percent, is lower than the US rate of 5 percent and the eurozone rate of about 10 percent.

But Japan’s economy has now slipped into deflation, with consumer prices lower in March than a year ago, while real GDP is declining. Despite near-zero borrowing costs, the fiscal deficit is running at nearly 7 percent of GDP, and government debt exceeds 230 percent of GDP.

When Prime Minister Shinzo Abe took office in 2012, he announced a strategy — comprising three “arrows” — to overcome the economy’s combination of slow growth and low inflation: very easy monetary policy, a short-term fiscal stimulus, and structural reforms to labor and product markets. But the government’s economic policies (so-called Abenomics) have not fixed Japan’s problems and are unlikely to do so in the future.

After Abe appointed Haruhiko Kuroda as the new head of the Bank of Japan (BOJ) and charged him with getting the inflation rate to two percent, Kuroda loosened monetary policy immediately and dramatically, by slashing interest rates and launching large-scale purchases of long-term government bonds.

This caused a sharp fall in the value of the yen and sent the interest rate on ten-year bonds toward zero. The more competitive exchange rate raised the profits of Japanese exporters, but not their output, while the weaker yen also raised import prices, reducing the real incomes of most Japanese households.

In January, the BOJ went further and introduced negative deposit rates on commercial banks’ mandatory reserves, which markets interpreted as a confusing act of desperation. That had the adverse effect of weakening household and business demand. And, despite the BOJ’s easing, global financial conditions soon caused a rise in the value of the yen, which rose nearly ten percent relative to the dollar.

Abe began his fiscal policy with a substantial spending program, focused primarily on repairing and replacing infrastructure affected by the 2011 earthquake. But he also raised the value-added tax (VAT) from five percent to eight percent to address the enormous deficit and growing national debt. The result was an economic downturn.

The third arrow of Abenomics — structural policies aimed at boosting potential growth — has barely been launched. The good news is that there has been some increase in female labor-force participation and in the number of tourists visiting Japan. And a variety of reforms are intended to overhaul the highly protected agricultural sector, though substantial change depends on ratification of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement (and even then the changes would be phased in only over several decades).

Long-term challenge

Japan’s declining population and shrinking labor force is a major long-term challenge. Although a system of temporary permits allows foreign workers to be employed in Japan for up to three years, the country will not seek to ameliorate adverse demographic trends by opening itself to permanent immigration.

Reluctance to expand the number of foreign workers and to change work customs to encourage more married women to join the labor force may reflect the relative affluence that Japan currently enjoys. The Japanese public may prefer to maintain its current lifestyle and cultural homogeneity, even though doing so is preventing more rapid economic growth.

Japan’s biggest immediate problem, however, is the budget deficit and government debt. If the BOJ succeeds in achieving a two-percent inflation rate, the deficit will rise rapidly, as the interest rate on government debt would increase from the current zero level.

Failure to implement the spending cuts and revenue increases needed to reduce the budget deficit would undermine confidence in the economy’s prospects and increase speculation that the government would eventually resort to some form of debt repudiation.

Abe thus faces a dilemma in deciding whether to raise the VAT further. Doing so is hard at a time when GDP has declined and CPI inflation has turned negative. And yet failure to raise the VAT or to cut government spending means continued large deficits and soaring government debt. If Abe can get public finances under control, Japan will be in a much stronger position to face its other economic challenges.

Martin Feldstein is Professor of Economics at Harvard University and President Emeritus of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Copyright: Project Syndicate.

Foreign Views


 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend