The story appears on

Page A7

April 20, 2015

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » Opinion » Foreign Views

City well-placed in fight for global tech hub crown

Recently, Shanghai’s government announced that its number 1 priority is to become a “globally influential technological innovation hub.” The megacity is on its way.

Shanghai’s aspiration was announced as Premier Li Keqiang’s new “Internet plus” strategy was revealed in Beijing. “We must seize the time now,” said Shanghai’s party chief Han Zheng in a statement.

The goal is ambitious but Shanghai is well-positioned to execute its new priority and the timing is favorable.

International R&D rivalry is no longer driven just by the US, Europe, or Japan, but also by China, as evidenced by significant shifts in student performance, R&D, and patents.

Since 2000, the US has no longer been featured in the top-10 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) lists for mathematics, science, or reading. Today, Shanghai is leading in each three rankings.

According to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), America dominated in total patent applications received from the early 1880s to the 1970s, when Japan caught up with the US. In 2010, China’s patenting overtook Japan; and two years later the US.

In 2012, two Chinese technology leaders, Huawei and ZTE, faced congressional hearings in Washington. That same day, my report was released in the US. I argued that there is a strong “Case for Huawei in America” because it could bring new investment and create jobs. Washington shunned the two companies, but today Huawei leads international patent filings, followed by Qualcomm and ZTE.

In turn, China is likely to surpass Europe in R&D spending by the late 2010s and the US by the early 2020s, as evidenced by my recent report of US innovation.

US companies account for over a third of R&D investment by the top 2,000 companies worldwide, slightly more than Europe. While China’s share of R&D spending is still low, it has grown by a factor of 15 over the past decade, while spending has contracted in Europe, US and Japan.

America accounts for most global venture capital (VC). But US VC continues to suffer from the burst of the Internet boom and the aftermath of the global crisis. Initial public offerings (IPOs) tell a similar story.

Chinese VC and IPOs, though starting from a very low base, are rising rapidly. In 2012, Facebook raised US$16 billion of the total US$21.5 billion. That pales in comparison with the historic US$25 billion IPO of Alibaba whose market value was estimated at US$231 billion.

Shanghai is well-positioned. It has strengths in student performance, patents and R&D, and high-level universities. It has significant presence by foreign multinationals and their R&D operations and high-quality foreign direct investment (FDI).

The city is pushing new initiatives to promote itself as a start-up hub, including the “Entrepreneurship in Pujiang Action Plan” and host of new entrepreneurship schools which aim at 200,000 technology entrepreneurs by 2020.

China’s first Free Trade Zone (FTZs) was launched in Shanghai, while new FTZs are being created in its rival cities. But unlike them, Shanghai has a far more international outlook and more expats. Shanghai is on the right path. But it won’t win without fierce competition.

Dan Steinbock, Research Director of International Business at the India, China, and America Institute and a visiting fellow at Shanghai Institutes for International Studies in China and the EU Center in Singapore.




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend