Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
California needs strong Federal clean water rules
Print Edition
YOU don’t have to be a native Californian to know how important water is to our state, especially in light of the current record-breaking drought. The total cost of this drought is already running into the billions of dollars, and could end up costing us thousands of jobs.
Water is an economic necessity, and we need to protect it. That’s why a law like the Clean Water Act, designed to protect our waterways from harmful discharges, is so important — not just for agriculture, but also to industries like tourism, fishing, manufacturing and even technology.
With water so scarce in California, and the state expected to grow to 50 million people by 2050, we need to make sure we’re protecting every drop.
Unfortunately, a pair of Supreme Court decisions in 2001 and 2006 made Clean Water Act enforcement confusing. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a new “Waters of the US” rule to address this confusion. We need Senator Dianne Feinstein to join us in supporting that rule.
“Waters of the US” makes clear that most seasonal and rain-dependent streams, as well as wetlands near rivers and streams, are and have always been protected waterways.
About 60 percent of streams in the US flow seasonally or following rainfall, and about 117 million Americans — more than one in three of us — get drinking water from public systems that rely at least in part on these streams.
Contrary to what many opponents have claimed, these rules would not give the EPA any new authority under the Clean Water Act. No new types of waters would get protection, and despite some particularly strange claims, irrigation ditches would not be covered. The rules would simply define the waterways the EPA can protect more clearly.
They will also give the business community the certainty it has been asking for since the Supreme Court’s decisions a decade ago. This aligns with Senator Feinstein’s demonstrated support for California businesses and her efforts to address the drought-induced state of emergency declared by Governor Jerry Brown in January.
Business impact
Small business owners are in favor of these protections. A national scientific poll recently released by the American Sustainable Business Council found that a whopping 80 percent of small business owners support the protections described by the proposed “Waters of the US” rule. And that includes strong majorities of Republicans, as well as Democrats and independents.
They understand that without clean water, many companies cannot operate. Big business isn’t different. One reason Silicon Valley soared as a technology manufacturing hub was its access to clean water from the Sierra Nevada. That growth has had a tremendous positive impact on our state’s economy, to the point where Silicon Valley accounts for 28 percent of our income tax base.
And smart water regulations can do wonders for economic development.
Then there’s the flip side.
If we don’t protect our waterways, our local economies will suffer. The Elk River spill earlier this year cost US$19 million a day. Our economy doesn’t need that kind of damage.
No business benefits from contaminated water, and for many industries it’s potentially devastating. We need to act now to protect them. That’s why we hope Senator Feinstein will help protect this precious resource by supporting this new EPA rule.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
