The story appears on

Page A7

February 18, 2015

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » Opinion » Chinese Views

Public clamors for more open government information

The Chinese authorities may think they did a sufficient job in last year’s move to make government information more transparent, but they have yet to convince the public.

Recently the central departments and local governments published their annual reports on the disclosure of information in 2014 under the nation’s drive for a clean and transparent government, an unprecedented move.

Most authorities touted their efforts in promoting transparency but without detailing how their budgets were spent. Some even marked their transparency as nearly 100 percent.

They were just feeling too good.

While hailing the authorities’ improvement in transparency, people criticized the authorities for tending to talk about achievements while avoiding problems in their reports. For many, the information some authorities publicized last year was still opaque, and information about people’s concerns never published.

Authorities seem to care only about the act of disclosing, not what they disclose. But the people care. They want tangible, minute information such as more details on spending on official vehicles, official travel and reception, land acquisition and public facilities.

A really clean government should dare to expose its power under the sun and actively publish all information for the oversight of the people.

There are some good examples such as the State Forestry Administration, which honestly apologized in its late disclosure on reporting and slow updates.

The Ministry of Transport’s annual report was also applauded by the public for clear information disclosure using charts and pictures.

Another strength is the steady questioning by the people; in some cases people have even charged governments with neglect in information disclosure.

According to the Supreme People’s Court, failure in information transparency has become a major source of lawsuits against the government.

Even for the “comparatively transparent” Shanghai municipal government, the number of lawsuits it lost concerning information disclosure accounted for 26.5 percent of the total lost lawsuits in the city in 2013.

Regarding the disclosure of government information, rules must be worked out to stipulate the exact scope of information that must be published and how detailed the information should be.

An evaluation mechanism led by a third agency is also suggested, as it is likely to be fairer and more objective than the governments’ self-evaluation.




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend