The story appears on

Page A6

February 18, 2011

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » Opinion » Opinion Columns

Slum razing by 'caring' officials lusting for GDP

A SHANTY town of hundreds of shacks was stealthily pulverized by a local government in Sanya, Hainan Province, which called them a fire risk.

The Xinhua news agency reported that the government undertook the surprise demolition coded "Hammer" on January 19, just before the Spring Festival, when most slum residents had already gone home for family reunions.

When they returned after the festival, they came upon a scene of utter devastation.

In a Xinhua photo carried on Monday's Shanghai Daily, we saw a small boy, wearing only a shirt, standing on ruins that were once his home. His father picks through the rubble to salvage some articles that can still be used.

This cheap housing was first set up in the late 1990s when peasants from Danzhou in the northern part of the island discovered that raising pigs in Sanya was much more profitable than eking out a subsistence from the salty, meager soil at home.

Some also collected recyclable materials and were engaged in transport.

The slum area once contained 308 households, covering 30,000 square meters, and supplying shelter and livelihood for some 2,000 people.

The local government claimed that demolition proceeded from the best of intentions.

In an explanation given by the government on Monday evening, the slum is said to pose a fire risk, cause environmental pollution, and was difficult to manage.

Since these makeshift shelters were mostly made of wood planks, bamboo and other flammable materials, they might pose a serious fire hazard, particularly during the Spring Festival season when many firecrackers and fireworks were set off.

The local government would be held responsible if such an accident occurred.

But since this plan for benevolent demolition was unappreciated and vehemently resisted by the residents, the government decided to go it alone, taking preemptive action by pulverizing these slum shelters at a time when resistance was weak.

Is the local government now responsible for providing for the residents made homeless and jobless?

Of course not.

The government is "under no obligation to compensate," as these people are outsiders whose slum shelters were unauthorized from the very beginning, officials said.

Excuses

Compensating them would encourage others to follow suit, the government explained.

"The sanitary conditions are extremely poor in the slum where there is no sewage system. The whole lot is littered with garbage, pig excrement, waste water, and the pervasive stench is overwhelming, raising concern for infectious disease," according to the official explanation.

Here I wonder whether fear of infectious disease might not lead the government to take similarly peremptory action by exterminating the immediate source of contagion, human life.

Few Chinese will buy official excuses for inflicting destruction. For those cognizant of the gap between what officials claim to be and what they really are, the real explanation is not difficult to find.

The shanty town had not been set up overnight, but had stood there for more than 10 years. Over that time the local government had been quite indifferent to the firs risk and stench, allowing the shanty town to expand to more than 300 households - and then suddenly official tolerance evaporated.

One Xinhua photo of the scene of devastation provides a clue to the answer. It shows a small girl in front of the ruins of her home, while the background is dominated by several towering high rises.

As a matter of fact, local government revenue from increasingly profitable real estate projects is the key to comprehending nearly all the bewildering occurrences in China today, not least in Hainan island, which saw one of most spectacular real estate crashes in modern China during the late 1990s.

When I was there on a reporting assignment in 2006, I could still saw some lanweilou (buildings unfinished when funding dries up) in downtown Haikou, the capital of Hainan Province. They were reminders of that era.

But even this bitter experience did not inoculate the island from the endemic fever that has gripped whole China in the past few years.

The whole island is enjoying another spell of property prosperity that defies the wildest imagination. By conservative estimates, property prices in Sanya have jumped several times in the past couple of years.

Riding on the red-hot property market, the local government is seeing leap in GDP. During the first quarter last year, the regional GDP jumped a stunning 25.1 percent.

The annualized GDP growth for the region last year was 15.8 percent, more than 5 percent higher than the national average.

Given such hectic growth, and how growth tends to motivate local officials, we should be more understanding of the local government's low tolerance of slums and unauthorized buildings that could make room for glittering properties.

True answers

The local government reportedly did attempt to "rectify" the shabby shelters in the past, but gave up because of the population density and the "excessively low income" of residents.

Apparently the red-hot real estate market dictates desperate remedies. At a time when murders can be used to force people out of their homes, a sneak attack doesn't sound so brutal.

These eyesores no longer mar Sanya's chiseled skyline, and these low-income residents no longer have to undertake such dirty jobs as pig raising. We can leave the dirty work to venture capitalists, like Goldman Sachs.

We admire our officials' efficiency. Suddenly they found the stench from pigsties intolerable, and leveled the shacks at one fell swoop.

But we also hope they can be equally efficient in other undertakings.

For instance, it was reported on Tuesday that 10 child beggars have been rescued in Sanya by police following tips from Internet users.

Why didn't the sight of the poor beggars prompt the kind-hearted local government to take peremptory action before online tip-offs?




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend