Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
US plays with fire by printing money
By Dan Steinbock |
November 29, 2010, Monday
|
Print Edition
Print Edition
THE recent financial crisis has seen Asia emerge as an economic powerhouse - indeed, as a key driver of global growth.
Indeed, while Asia is rising, the rich industrial countries of the old G-7 have been drifting into a liquidity trap. As the ongoing recession exhausts the traditional instruments of monetary policy, central banks are opting for new rounds of quantitative easing (QE).
And, with investors seeking higher returns, more QE - especially by the US - will drive "hot money" (short-term portfolio flows) into high-yield emerging-market economies, which could inflate dangerous asset bubbles in Asia, Latin America, and elsewhere.
The US Federal Reserve and the Obama administration remain rhetorically wedded to maintaining a "strong dollar." But it is the dollar's weakness that has boosted US corporate earnings since the crisis erupted. Since early 2002, the US dollar has fallen by one-third against major currencies, and recently this decline has intensified.
Since the end of August, when Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke argued for another round of QE, the dollar has plunged more than 7 percent against a basket of half a dozen major currencies. Inflation-protected securities are now being sold at negative yields for the first time ever.
Following the mid-term elections and the resurgence of the Republicans in the US Congress, the Fed's decision to pump US$600 billion into the economy by mid-2011 is likely to trigger similar actions in the United Kingdom, Japan, and other advanced economies.
Moreover, the Fed has left the door open to more quantitative easing next year - a tacit acknowledgement that the recovery will be long and sluggish. But the effect of a new round of QE on interest rates could be small and limited to an announcement effect, as the Fed's own research indicates.
In fact, the full impact of America's "QE2" will not be domestic, because the net effect will be a weaker US dollar as speculators bet on its decline. Successive waves of QE would amount to debasing the value of the dollar, and thus inflating away massive US debts.
Twin threats
Meanwhile, developing countries are moving in the opposite direction. In October, the People's Bank of China, responding to the twin threats of inflation and asset bubbles, raised its one-year deposit and lending rates by 25 basis points, to 2.5 percent and 5.56 percent, respectively - the first increases since 2007.
In the West, concerns about the impact on Chinese growth triggered a fearful sell-off in the markets. Right before the Fed acted, the Reserve Bank of India raised its benchmark short-term interest rate by 25 basis points, to 6.25 percent, to fight inflation, and China's central bank now indicates that it might raise interest rates further.
Global divide
In Brazil, interest rates remain close to 11 percent. After the Fed's QE move, Brazil is preparing to retaliate. "It's no use throwing dollars out of a helicopter," as Brazilian Minister of Finance Guido Mantega put it.
Soon afterward, Germany's finance minister called US policy "clueless," while his South African counterpart thought that the Fed's move undermined the G-20 leaders' "spirit of multilateral cooperation."
Today, a deepening global divide sets the slow-growing US against many emerging-market economies and commodity-producing countries. The worldwide impact of QE has only aggravated the chasm, reflected by the rifts among the G-20 nations.
There is also the risk of a disruptive decline in the US dollar, which could prompt investors to flee US debt.
In his famous 2002 speech on the potential of deflation in America, Bernanke suggested that Franklin Delano Roosevelt's 40 percent devaluation of the dollar in 1933-1934 shows that exchange-rate policy can be an "effective weapon against deflation."
Imported inflation
Today, however, global economic integration and interdependence are much deeper than in the 1930s. As Chen Deming, China's Minister of Commerce, recently complained, "The United States' issuance of dollars is out of control and international commodity prices are continuing to rise." As a result, "China is being attacked by imported inflation."
The impact of the Fed's policy and hot money has been dramatic. In the third quarter of this year, China's foreign-exchange reserves increased by US$194 billion, which far exceeded the country's US$66 billion trade surplus and US$23 billion in inflows of foreign direct investment. At least part of the difference can be attributed to "hot money."
Most importantly, a disruptive decline of the US dollar (or a disruptive appreciation of the Chinese renminbi) could hinder not only China's growth, but also global recovery.
In the 1990s, emerging and developing economies were still dependent on G-7 growth. In the past decade, these countries have, as OECD research has shown, become dependent on Chinese growth. Any decline in China's growth would thus significantly undermine poverty reduction in the emerging world. In a world where the G-7 no longer drives global growth, printing money is playing with fire.
(The author is Research Director of International Business at India, China and America Institute, and Visiting Fellow at Shanghai Institutes for International Studies. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2010. www.project-syndicate.org)
Indeed, while Asia is rising, the rich industrial countries of the old G-7 have been drifting into a liquidity trap. As the ongoing recession exhausts the traditional instruments of monetary policy, central banks are opting for new rounds of quantitative easing (QE).
And, with investors seeking higher returns, more QE - especially by the US - will drive "hot money" (short-term portfolio flows) into high-yield emerging-market economies, which could inflate dangerous asset bubbles in Asia, Latin America, and elsewhere.
The US Federal Reserve and the Obama administration remain rhetorically wedded to maintaining a "strong dollar." But it is the dollar's weakness that has boosted US corporate earnings since the crisis erupted. Since early 2002, the US dollar has fallen by one-third against major currencies, and recently this decline has intensified.
Since the end of August, when Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke argued for another round of QE, the dollar has plunged more than 7 percent against a basket of half a dozen major currencies. Inflation-protected securities are now being sold at negative yields for the first time ever.
Following the mid-term elections and the resurgence of the Republicans in the US Congress, the Fed's decision to pump US$600 billion into the economy by mid-2011 is likely to trigger similar actions in the United Kingdom, Japan, and other advanced economies.
Moreover, the Fed has left the door open to more quantitative easing next year - a tacit acknowledgement that the recovery will be long and sluggish. But the effect of a new round of QE on interest rates could be small and limited to an announcement effect, as the Fed's own research indicates.
In fact, the full impact of America's "QE2" will not be domestic, because the net effect will be a weaker US dollar as speculators bet on its decline. Successive waves of QE would amount to debasing the value of the dollar, and thus inflating away massive US debts.
Twin threats
Meanwhile, developing countries are moving in the opposite direction. In October, the People's Bank of China, responding to the twin threats of inflation and asset bubbles, raised its one-year deposit and lending rates by 25 basis points, to 2.5 percent and 5.56 percent, respectively - the first increases since 2007.
In the West, concerns about the impact on Chinese growth triggered a fearful sell-off in the markets. Right before the Fed acted, the Reserve Bank of India raised its benchmark short-term interest rate by 25 basis points, to 6.25 percent, to fight inflation, and China's central bank now indicates that it might raise interest rates further.
Global divide
In Brazil, interest rates remain close to 11 percent. After the Fed's QE move, Brazil is preparing to retaliate. "It's no use throwing dollars out of a helicopter," as Brazilian Minister of Finance Guido Mantega put it.
Soon afterward, Germany's finance minister called US policy "clueless," while his South African counterpart thought that the Fed's move undermined the G-20 leaders' "spirit of multilateral cooperation."
Today, a deepening global divide sets the slow-growing US against many emerging-market economies and commodity-producing countries. The worldwide impact of QE has only aggravated the chasm, reflected by the rifts among the G-20 nations.
There is also the risk of a disruptive decline in the US dollar, which could prompt investors to flee US debt.
In his famous 2002 speech on the potential of deflation in America, Bernanke suggested that Franklin Delano Roosevelt's 40 percent devaluation of the dollar in 1933-1934 shows that exchange-rate policy can be an "effective weapon against deflation."
Imported inflation
Today, however, global economic integration and interdependence are much deeper than in the 1930s. As Chen Deming, China's Minister of Commerce, recently complained, "The United States' issuance of dollars is out of control and international commodity prices are continuing to rise." As a result, "China is being attacked by imported inflation."
The impact of the Fed's policy and hot money has been dramatic. In the third quarter of this year, China's foreign-exchange reserves increased by US$194 billion, which far exceeded the country's US$66 billion trade surplus and US$23 billion in inflows of foreign direct investment. At least part of the difference can be attributed to "hot money."
Most importantly, a disruptive decline of the US dollar (or a disruptive appreciation of the Chinese renminbi) could hinder not only China's growth, but also global recovery.
In the 1990s, emerging and developing economies were still dependent on G-7 growth. In the past decade, these countries have, as OECD research has shown, become dependent on Chinese growth. Any decline in China's growth would thus significantly undermine poverty reduction in the emerging world. In a world where the G-7 no longer drives global growth, printing money is playing with fire.
(The author is Research Director of International Business at India, China and America Institute, and Visiting Fellow at Shanghai Institutes for International Studies. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2010. www.project-syndicate.org)
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
