Home » Sunday » Technology
‘Doomsday Clock’ ticks down
Print Edition
THE Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists says Earth is now closer to human-caused doomsday than it has been in more than 30 years because of global warming and nuclear weaponry. But other experts say that’s much too gloomy.
The US advocacy group founded by the creators of the atomic bomb moved their famed “Doomsday Clock” ahead two minutes. It said the world is now three minutes from a catastrophic midnight, instead of five minutes.
“This is about doomsday; this is about the end of civilization as we know it,” bulletin executive director Kennette Benedict said in Washington.
She called both climate change and modernization of nuclear weaponry equal but undeniable threats to humanity’s continued existence that triggered the 20 scientists on the board to decide to move the clock closer to midnight.
“The probability of global catastrophe is very high, and the actions needed to reduce the risks of disaster must be taken very soon,” Benedict said.
Other scientists aren’t so pessimistic.
Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of both geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University, said in an e-mail: “I suspect that humans will ‘muddle through’ the climate situation much as we have muddled through the nuclear weapons situation‚ limiting the risk with cooperative international action and parallel domestic policies.”
The bulletin has included climate change in its clock since 2007.
“The fact that the Doomsday clock-setters changed their definition of ‘doomsday’ shows how profoundly the world has changed‚ they have to find a new source of doom because global thermonuclear war is now so unlikely,” Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker wrote in an e-mail. Pinker in his book “The Better Angels of our Nature” uses statistics to argue the world has become less war-like, less violent and more tolerant in recent centuries.
Richard Somerville, a member of the Bulletin’s board who is a climate scientist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, said the trend in heat-trapping emissions from the burning of fossil fuels will “lead to major climatic disruption globally. The urgency has nothing to do with politics or ideology. It arises from the laws of physics and biology and chemistry. These laws are non-negotiable.”
But Somerville agreed the climate change threat isn’t all-or-nothing as it is with nuclear war. The lack of progress in the dismantling of nuclear weapons and countries like the US and Russia spending hundreds of billions of dollars on modernizing nuclear weaponry makes an atomic bomb explosion‚ either accidental or on purpose‚ a continuing and more urgent threat, Benedict said.
But she acknowledged the group has warned of imminent nuclear disaster since 1947 and it hasn’t happened yet.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
