The story appears on

Page A12

January 18, 2015

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » Sunday

Men’s fidelity varies by choices

WOMEN want to settle down while men prefer to play the field, right?

It’s not that simple, according to a latest study that challenged long-held views of sexual selection.

It turns out the dynamics of sex are partly driven by the law of supply and demand: a man’s fidelity depends to a large degree on the number of available women.

“When women are rare, men respond by desiring long-term committed relationships with a single partner,” said Ryan Schacht, University of Utah anthropologist and the study’s lead author. “When women are hard to find, the best strategy is to find one and stick with her.”

Men who continue skirt-chasing when competition among men is high risk losing out altogether, said Schacht: “If a man were not to live up to a woman’s expectations, she has plenty other options to choose from.”

The findings, published in the journal Royal Society Open Science, are based on a 16-month study of members of the 13,000-strong Makushi tribal community of hunters, fishermen and farmers in southwest Guyana.

The Makushi were chosen because they form a homogenous group that shares a belief system and socioeconomic circumstances, which meant there were no religious and cultural differences to color the results.

“In general, Makushi men show a greater willingness to engage in uncommitted sex than do women, as the stereotype predicts,” said Schacht.

“Men, when women were abundant, were the cads we often expect them to be. They had many sexual partners, and yet still wanted more!”

But this changed in areas where men were in the majority.

“As the sex ratio became more male-biased, men’s interest in short-term relationships waned,” said Schacht.

“In fact, in the communities with the most surplus men, men’s and women’s preferences were indistinguishable — both men and women desired long-term, committed relationships with a single partner.”

Women’s preference for a committed relationship did not change, the researchers found. Why?

“Short-term, uncommitted relationships are potentially costly” for women, for whom the physical and time investment in procreation, as carriers and rearers of children, is a lot bigger than for men.

Some of the results were surprising, said the team, for example contradicting the conventional view that when men outnumber women there are likely to be more fights among men and an increase in sexually transmitted diseases.

But mainly, they challenge the commonly held view of gender roles that stems from Charles Darwin’s near 150-year-old theory of sexual selection — essentially a picture of choosy, coy females and ardent, promiscuous males.

“It’s time to move away from stereotyped assumptions of men having certain behaviors and women having others,” said Schacht.

The message “is that sexual stereotyping of what is ‘male’ or ‘female’ behavior based on biological sex differences is largely inappropriate,” he said. Sex matters, culture matters, partner availability matters.”

The study may hold interesting social data for Asian countries where a preference for male offspring has led to a majority of men over women in certain age groups.

But the findings may not apply to all communities, said Schacht, who noted influences such as differences in culture, religion and socioeconomic status.

“The global story is likely to be a bit more complicated,” he said, and in patriarchal societies, for example, a gender ratio favoring men may intensify male sexual control over women.




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend