Home » Sports » American Football
Wells hits back at Brady claims
Print Edition
The lawyer who investigated the New England Patriots insisted he found direct, not just circumstantial, evidence to show quarterback Tom Brady knew team employees were deflating footballs.
Annoyed by criticism from Brady’s agent, Ted Wells decided to take the unusual step of holding a conference call on Tuesday, a day after the NFL suspended the Super Bowl MVP for the season’s first four games based on the report.
Wells said his findings would have been strong enough to convince a jury under the “preponderance of evidence” standard, which is used in many civil cases.
Wells’ report asserted it was “more probable than not” that Brady “was at least generally aware” of plans by two team employees to prepare the balls to his liking, below the league-mandated minimum of 12.5 pounds per square inch.
Wells testily rebutted assertions from Don Yee, Brady’s agent, questioning Wells’ independence because his firm does other business with the NFL.
“What drove the decision in this report is one thing: It was the evidence,” Wells said. “I could not ethically ignore the import and relevancy of those text messages and the other evidence.”
Wells specifically mentioned two series of text exchanges between officials’ locker room attendant Jim McNally and equipment assistant John Jastremski. In one, McNally referred to himself as “the Deflator” and joked about going to ESPN. In another, Jastremski mentioned speaking to Brady the previous night, saying the quarterback knew McNally was stressed out by needing to deflate the balls.
“That is not circumstantial evidence. That is two of the participants in a scheme discussing what has taken place.”
Last week, Yee called Wells’ report “a significant and terrible disappointment,” suggesting it “reached a conclusion first, and then determined so-called facts”.
Along with denying any bias, Wells derided the idea that the NFL wanted the investigation to implicate a quarterback he described as “one of the most popular, iconic players in the league.”
“That does not make sense,” Wells said. “It’s a ridiculous allegation.”
To Yee’s assertion that he omitted key statements from Brady, Wells challenged the agent to release his full transcript of the interview. “Nothing, I guarantee you, in his notes would make any difference in my decision,” he said.
He also disputed Yee’s characterization of the investigation as a “sting,” noting that NFL officials initially didn’t take the Indianapolis Colts’ complaints seriously during the AFC Championship game last January. The Patriots wound up routing Indianapolis 45-7 that day, then went on to beat the Seattle Seahawks in the Super Bowl 28-24 for Brady’s fourth title.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
