Home » Opinion » Foreign Views
Bees stung by EPA’s flawed pesticide policies
Print Edition
Although the “buzz” about bee declines makes headlines, excites public concern and warrants a White House Task Force on the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators, bees are still in jeopardy.
The United States Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency have failed to act with force on one of the key causes of pollinator declines: neonicotinoid pesticides.
Neonicotinoid pesticides are a key driver in bee declines, affecting bees’ immune systems, navigation, reproduction and foraging, even at low doses.
Last year, 29 scientists from the International Union for Conservation of Nature reviewed 800 studies from two decades of research. These researchers found that the evidence is overwhelmingly clear: neonicotinoids have adverse effects on bees and the current level of use of these pesticides is unsustainable.
If they’re so harmful to bees, how did neonicotinoids get on the market?
In the US, neonics were originally approved for use through a loophole called “conditional registration.” Conditional registration allows pesticides to go to market even when the pesticide manufacturer can’t provide the necessary research on the chemical’s impact. Some 65 percent of pesticides now on the market were approved through this process.
Lack of transparency
Another shortcoming in transparency arises from the primary use of neonicotinoids as seed treatments, pesticide coatings pre-applied to seeds before farmers buy them.
Of the 200 million acres of US farmland treated with neonicotionids, 95 percent had neonicotinoids applied via coated seeds. But remarkably, seed coatings aren’t tracked or regulated like other uses of pesticides, because of another EPA loophole that exempts “treated articles” from regulation.
This makes it quite difficult for lawmakers and researchers to know where, and in what quantities, neonic-treated seeds are planted. This is critical information that could help illuminate correlations between neonicotinoid use and bee losses.
Though the EPA is responsible for ensuring that pesticides approved for use don’t harm bees, the agency may be considering relinquishing this responsibility back to the states, calling for individual state “pollinator protection plans” instead of a comprehensive change in federal pesticide policy to protect bees.
Unfortunately, these state plans would likely put the onus on beekeepers and state agencies that lack the resources to implement truly protective plans.
The EPA has an opportunity to correct errors it made in registering neonicotinoids by restricting or suspending their use nationwide. Though the EPA recently announced it won’t allow new uses of some neonicotinoids, there is work left to be done. The numerous bee-harming products already on the market will remain in use. And the EPA has already approved two new systemic insecticides in the past year and that are not technically classified as neonics, although they pose the same hazards to bees. New products like these would not be subject to the moratorium.
We rely on the EPA to protect pollinators from pesticides and preserve their important role within our food system. We urge the EPA and the White House pollinator task force to restrict or suspend neonicotinoid pesticides through a transparent process. It’s time to maximize public accountability and minimize the influence that pesticide companies exert behind closed doors.
Lex Horan is an organizer with Pesticide Action Network North America (PAN). PAN is a member of the OpenTheGovernment.org coalition. Copyright: American Forum.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
