Home » Opinion » Chinese Views
Less reliance on Gaokao for admission sparks debate
Print Edition
A reform package aimed at changing China’s exam-centered education has sparked discussion over how to ensure fairness in the National College Entrance Exam, or the Gaokao.
China’s university admission is now solely based on whether the applicants can reach the minimum Gaokao scores required by each university.
The Gaokao arrangement has long been scolded for suffocating creativity, as China’s secondary schools have eschewed broad-based instruction in favor of making sure high school students can obtain high scores on the Gaokao.
Although Chinese education authorities have been advocating schools to stop the exam-centered mindset, education professionals and students argue that no true change will be made until universities adopt a different approach on admissions.
But last week, the Education Ministry determined it would make a move. It announced Gaokao reform measures on Tuesday and Wednesday, asking universities not to base their judgment of applicants solely on Gaokao scores.
Morality standards
In addition to the scores, students will be evaluated on their morality standards, physical health, art cultivation and social practices, according to the reform plan. Students also will be allowed to submit reports of three electives from a pool of six plus biology, chemistry, geography, history, physics and politics, together with their mandatory Chinese, math and English scores. The electives will not be scored in marks but graded in levels.
Yu Shijie, director of admission at Tsinghua University, said the reform could objectively reflect students’ improvement in middle school.
“The biggest public concern is the abuse of power. People are worried that the admission will have no clear standard if the significance of scores is reduced,” said Chu Chaohui, a researcher at the National Institute of Education Sciences.
Currently, the grading of extracurricular performance is within the discretion of teachers, and some teachers just randomly give students scores before their graduation.
Falsification of social engagement records is not an uncommon practice. Some parents worry they may have to trade bribes for better grades.
“We need more professional and persuasive replacements to convince the public that the change will not damage fairness but evaluates applicants more comprehensively,” Chu said.
“Gaokao is the fairest channel of social mobility. If anything goes wrong in the extracurricular evaluation, it’s fairer for us to just stick to the current system, otherwise many disadvantaged people will have little chance,” said Cao Jianmin, a resident in the city of Xi’an.
Wang Dianjun, headmaster of the high school attached to Tsinghua University, however, believes the proposed changes will promote social integrity as long as future admission can employ a strict process of evaluation and supervision.
The inclusion of factors other than Gaokao scores concern social integrity, Wang said. “It will take some time to build a system that upholds social integrity.”
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
