The story appears on

Page A7

November 20, 2015

GET this page in PDF

Free for subscribers

View shopping cart

Related News

Home » Opinion

The path of ‘civilization state’ as against the road of ‘nation state’

THE 6th World Forum on China Studies in Shanghai, which opens today, has gathered over 300 renowned scholars from China and abroad to deliberate on “China’s reform and the opportunities for the world.”

Living in Chicago with news fed by CNN, FOX, MSNBC and other television channels, I can see China’s growing impact on the international communities.

China is increasingly becoming a factor in the stability and fluctuation of the New York stock exchange. Her name is increasingly invoked in political commentaries even in the absence of thorny issues between Beijing and Washington. The Americans are increasingly feeling good that there is a stable and booming Chinese economy while, at the same time, nursing a hidden fear of a rising China.

There is universal admiration for China while, in some quarters, more fear than love. I think this should be borne in mind when China celebrates its own achievements.

It is a pity that an ancient civilization that has been so warmly endearing to the world for thousands of years is now a neophyte to the art of winning hearts and minds abroad.

Historical developments

The 6th World Forum on China Studies has a Herculean task to perform. Drawing from my six-decade experience and findings in China studies from abroad, I wish to take the readers of Shanghai Daily on a tour of historical developments of civilization as well as the “nation states.”

The great writer, Rabindranath Tagore, described the phenomenon of many ancient civilizations turning into ruins while only in China and India the lamps of civilization never extinguished when they were first lighted millennia ago.

His observation contrasts the different roads of development between the Eastern and Western Hemispheres. I am categorizing them as the road of development in the “civilization state” and the “nation state.”

I hope China will embark on the “civilization road” steadily and firmly and avoid the beaten tracks of the great powers of the West.

The concept of the “nation state” was born at the Westphalia Conference in Europe in 1648.

The “nation state” path advocates individualism, subjugating culture to the law of the market with “free” competition to implement the survival of the fittest theory. The greater the national economy grows the severer is the social disparity.

The “nation state” flexes muscles before other countries and expands horizontally, treating other countries (especially neighbors) as rivals of competition.

Big “nation states” are renowned actors in the trilogy of rise-climax-decline.

The other road is the “civilization road.” To begin with, China and India are civilization twins of the “Himalaya Sphere.” There flows from Himalaya Ganga River into the Bay of Bengal and Indus River into the Arabian Sea. The two rivers join the Indian Ocean to draw the contours of a “sphere of Indian civilization.” Similarly, the third longest river on earth, Yangtse, and the fifth longest, Huanghe, flow from the same place of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau with one towards the south and the other towards the north. The two great rivers carved out the contours of the “sphere of Chinese civilization.”

The ancient civilizations of the Western Hemisphere were not blessed by such “sphere of civilization” processes, thus plunging into the rise-climax-decline trilogy to be buried among the historical ruins today.

From the ancient times Chinese and Indian civilizations have conceived the ideas of “common entity.”

Ancient Chinese sages observed: “All within the four seas are brothers” while ancient Indian sages observed: “vasudhaiva kutumbakam” (the world is one family).

The Indian tradition believes in the prevalence of the universal and infinite paramatman (Supreme Soul) over atman (individual life). China internalized this concept to develop a cultural tradition of subordinating xiaowo (micro-me) to dawo (macro-me) and even sacrificing xiaowo for dawo.

Recently, there is a loud entreaty in China for constructing three “common entities”: the “common entity with a shared destiny,” the “common entity with a shared interest,” and the “common entity with a shared responsibility” in Asia.

Shared civilization

I think the two great civilizations of China and India have been millennial “common entities with a shared civilization,” making it a conception of four “common entities” (each with a “shared civilization,” “shared destiny,” “shared interest,” and “shared responsibility”).

This conception of four “common entities” shines upon the road of development for China today, not the “nation state” path, but the “civilization road” towards the goal of “civilization state.”

No single nation was able to fill in the space created by the contours of the “sphere of Chinese civilization.” We see an endeavour of thousands of nations of varying sizes in the unified China.

The ancient text, Lushi Chunqiu (Mr. Lu’s Discourse on Spring and Autumn), authored by Lu Buwei, carries this narrative: “There were ten thousand states all-under-Heaven (tianxia) during the time of the Great Yu, and the number reduced to three thousand odd during the time of the Great Tang. Today, none of them survives.” This concept of tianxia (all-under-Heaven) is exactly the space carved out by the two great rivers demonstrating China’s development beyond the “nation state” path.

No regret

Confucius observed: “zhao wen dao xi si keyi,” which literally sounds like “When I hear there is Tao in the morning, I don’t regret dying in the evening.” The correct interpretation of the often misunderstood Confucian adage is: “I can die without regret any time when I see the goal of civilization state has become a living reality.”

Such a great statement by the Chinese sage looking forward to the early realization of the “civilization state” must now be resurrected from oblivion to guide China’s road of development.

India’s paramatman and China’s tianxia traditions clearly propped up the “civilization road” in which individualism could not become riotous as in the “nation state” path.

A “nation state” is predicated on the notion of self-expansion into a superpower, ceaselessly waging aggressive wars and imposing one’s own culture onto others.

China never developed such a style. Ancient dynasties of China have created “a common entity with a shared civilization” over more than two millennia. Nation-states intervened from time to time but never changed China’s own “civilization road.” China might not have qualified as a “civilization state” but was on the way to become one.

The secret of China’s longevity is the “civilization road” which is the only reliable road for China’s development from strength to strength.

 

The author is a historian of Chinese studies, Sino-Indian relations and cultural exchanges. He now lives in Chicago, United States. Shanghai Daily condensed his article.




 

Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.

沪公网安备 31010602000204号

Email this to your friend