Impending leap second opens debate among precision time-keepers
Print Edition
QUESTION: When is a minute not a minute? The answer: At 2359 Greenwich Mean Time on June 30, when the world will experience a minute that will last 61 seconds.
The reason for the weird event is something called the leap second. That’s when timekeepers adjust high-precision clocks so that they are in sync with Earth’s rotation, which is affected by the gravitational tug of the Sun and the Moon.
Few of the planet’s 7.25 billion people are likely to be aware of the change. Even fewer will have set plans for how they will spend the extra moment.
But for horologists, the additional second is a big deal, and there is a wrangle as to whether it is vital or should be scrapped.
“There is a downside,” admits Daniel Gambis, director of the Service of the Rotation of the Earth — a branch of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service, in charge of saying when the second should be added.
To be clear, the leap second is not something that needs to be added to that old clock on your mantlepiece. Instead, its importance is for super-duper timepieces, especially those using the frequency of atoms as their tick-tock mechanism.
At the top of the atomic-clock range are “optical lattices” using strontium atoms, the latest example of which, unveiled in April, is accurate to 15 billion years.
Outside the lab, caesium and rubidium clocks are the workhorses of GPS satellites, which have to send synchronized signals so that satellite-navigation receivers can triangulate their position on Earth. On Earth, big-data computers may be less manic than atomic clocks but still need highly precise internal timers.
The Internet, for instance, sends data around the world in tiny packets that are then stitched together in micro-seconds. Some algorithms in financial trading count on gaining a tiny slice of a second over rivals to make a profit.
There have been 25 occasions since 1971 when the leap second was added in an effort to simplify GMT.But over the last 15 years, a debate has intensified about whether the change should be made, given the hassle.
“The argument of critics is that it’s become more and more difficult to manage these days, as so much equipment has internal clocks,” says Roland Lehoucq of France’s Atomic Energy Commission.
The last modification, on June 30, 2012, was disruptive for many Internet servers — the online reservation system for the Australian airline Qantas “went down for several hours,” said Gambis.
“It’s time to get rid of the leap second. It causes complications and bugs,” argued Sebastien Bize, a specialist in atomic clocks at the Paris Observatory.
Gambis defends the change on the grounds of principle.
“Should Man be the servant of technology? Or should technology be the servant of Man?” he asked rhetorically. After all, if the world got rid of the leap second, time as counted by mankind would no longer be coupled to the exact rotation of the planet it lives on.
- About Us
- |
- Terms of Use
- |
-
RSS - |
- Privacy Policy
- |
- Contact Us
- |
- Shanghai Call Center: 962288
- |
- Tip-off hotline: 52920043
- 沪ICP证：沪ICP备05050403号-1
- |
- 互联网新闻信息服务许可证：31120180004
- |
- 网络视听许可证：0909346
- |
- 广播电视节目制作许可证：沪字第354号
- |
- 增值电信业务经营许可证：沪B2-20120012
Copyright © 1999- Shanghai Daily. All rights reserved.Preferably viewed with Internet Explorer 8 or newer browsers.
